The Daily Fail

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:slwo: :slsa: :slbl: :slarr: :slcup: :slluv: :slroll: :sltee: :slcud: :sltgu: :slhat: :slex: :slhi: :slra: :slcool: :slusa: :slwot: :slsic: :slww: :slgg: :slwoot: :sldv: :sldu2: :slrnt: :slbx: :slna: :slluvv: :slhuh: :slead: :sloop: :sljo: :slsp: :slby: :slzz2: :slsm: :slch2: :slbell: :slrog: :slgw: :slchee: :slred: :slzip: :D :) :( :o :? 8) :x :P :wink: :|
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: The Daily Fail

Re: The Daily Fail

by Big Brother » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:07 am

Felony wrote:
Big Brother wrote:
Felony wrote:I'm sorry, you READ the Daily Mail? I thought it was on a par with Andrex and Charmin? :slex:

Just online. That way I don't pay anything but it costs them money.
I like your thinking comrade :wink:

lol

Re: The Daily Fail

by Felony » Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:31 am

Big Brother wrote:
Felony wrote:I'm sorry, you READ the Daily Mail? I thought it was on a par with Andrex and Charmin? :slex:

Just online. That way I don't pay anything but it costs them money.
I like your thinking comrade :wink:

Re: The Daily Fail

by Big Brother » Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:08 am

Felony wrote:I'm sorry, you READ the Daily Mail? I thought it was on a par with Andrex and Charmin? :slex:

Just online. That way I don't pay anything but it costs them money.

Re: The Daily Fail

by Felony » Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:30 am

I'm sorry, you READ the Daily Mail? I thought it was on a par with Andrex and Charmin? :slex:

Re: The Daily Fail

by Hysteria » Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:06 am

Basically the daily fail can print whatever it chooses because it's boss/owner is also the chair for the press complaints committee , I personally think they have a tombola sitting in the office filled with cr@p anti police anti gay anti immigrant anti women stories and they just dip in twice a week .

Re: The Daily Fail

by JEA » Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:50 pm

Perhaps a better way to reduce overtime spend (rather than asking officers to 'consider' the financial implications when deciding the necessity for arrest) would be to reduce the time it takes to deal with an arrest!

Re: The Daily Fail

by brianb » Sat Feb 20, 2010 11:06 pm

You don't need to employ any new staff to deal with it, just pass it on to the next shift.

It's been done this way for ages, another non-story.

Re: The Daily Fail

by steve999 » Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:48 pm

Big Brother wrote:The mail is getting itself in a right tiswas about the Police again. Last week they're in a furor about cops staying on after their shift to finish work, and shock horror they're getting paid for it.

Now they're in a fury because those cops are now going home instead of staying on and not getting paid for it.

Do they not have any continuity staff? Or are they like The Party in 1984 where they think if they change their minds maybe nobody will notice???

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ments.html
:slwo: This could easily be sorted by employing civilian staff to deal with handovers. They start at 7am and take the file direct from the officer. That way there is no cost to the force and officers get off on time. It is not rocket science!!

The Daily Fail

by Big Brother » Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:26 am

The mail is getting itself in a right tiswas about the Police again. Last week they're in a furor about cops staying on after their shift to finish work, and shock horror they're getting paid for it.

Now they're in a fury because those cops are now going home instead of staying on and not getting paid for it.

Do they not have any continuity staff? Or are they like The Party in 1984 where they think if they change their minds maybe nobody will notice???

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ments.html

Top